Quantum complexity of minimum cut

November 19, 2020 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Cybersecurity and Cyberforensics Conference

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Simon Apers, Troy Lee arXiv ID 2011.09823 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 7 Venue Cybersecurity and Cyberforensics Conference Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
The minimum cut problem in an undirected and weighted graph $G$ is to find the minimum total weight of a set of edges whose removal disconnects $G$. We completely characterize the quantum query and time complexity of the minimum cut problem in the adjacency matrix model. If $G$ has $n$ vertices and edge weights at least $1$ and at most $Ο„$, we give a quantum algorithm to solve the minimum cut problem using $\tilde O(n^{3/2}\sqrtΟ„)$ queries and time. Moreover, for every integer $1 \le Ο„\le n$ we give an example of a graph $G$ with edge weights $1$ and $Ο„$ such that solving the minimum cut problem on $G$ requires $Ξ©(n^{3/2}\sqrtΟ„)$ many queries to the adjacency matrix of $G$. These results contrast with the classical randomized case where $Ξ©(n^2)$ queries to the adjacency matrix are needed in the worst case even to decide if an unweighted graph is connected or not. In the adjacency array model, when $G$ has $m$ edges the classical randomized complexity of the minimum cut problem is $\tilde Θ(m)$. We show that the quantum query and time complexity are $\tilde O(\sqrt{mnΟ„})$ and $\tilde O(\sqrt{mnΟ„} + n^{3/2})$, respectively, where again the edge weights are between $1$ and $Ο„$. For dense graphs we give lower bounds on the quantum query complexity of $Ξ©(n^{3/2})$ for $Ο„> 1$ and $Ξ©(Ο„n)$ for any $1 \leq Ο„\leq n$. Our query algorithm uses a quantum algorithm for graph sparsification by Apers and de Wolf (FOCS 2020) and results on the structure of near-minimum cuts by Kawarabayashi and Thorup (STOC 2015) and Rubinstein, Schramm and Weinberg (ITCS 2018). Our time efficient implementation builds on Karger's tree packing technique (STOC 1996).
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted