FastHare: Fast Hamiltonian Reduction for Large-scale Quantum Annealing

May 10, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Phuc Thai, My T. Thai, Tam Vu, Thang N. Dinh arXiv ID 2205.05004 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 9 Venue International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Quantum annealing (QA) that encodes optimization problems into Hamiltonians remains the only near-term quantum computing paradigm that provides sufficient many qubits for real-world applications. To fit larger optimization instances on existing quantum annealers, reducing Hamiltonians into smaller equivalent Hamiltonians provides a promising approach. Unfortunately, existing reduction techniques are either computationally expensive or ineffective in practice. To this end, we introduce a novel notion of non-separable~group, defined as a subset of qubits in a Hamiltonian that obtains the same value in optimal solutions. We develop a theoretical framework on non-separability accordingly and propose FastHare, a highly efficient reduction method. FastHare, iteratively, detects and merges non-separable groups into single qubits. It does so within a provable worst-case time complexity of only $O(Ξ±n^2)$, for some user-defined parameter $Ξ±$. Our extensive benchmarks for the feasibility of the reduction are done on both synthetic Hamiltonians and 3000+ instances from the MQLIB library. The results show FastHare outperforms the roof duality, the implemented reduction method in D-Wave's SDK library, with 3.6x higher average reduction ratio. It demonstrates a high level of effectiveness with an average of 62% qubits saving and 0.3s processing time, advocating for Hamiltonian reduction as an inexpensive necessity for QA.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted