Mean estimation when you have the source code; or, quantum Monte Carlo methods

August 16, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Robin Kothari, Ryan O'Donnell arXiv ID 2208.07544 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.CC, cs.DS, math.PR, math.ST Citations 25 Venue ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Suppose $\boldsymbol{y}$ is a real random variable, and one is given access to ``the code'' that generates it (for example, a randomized or quantum circuit whose output is $\boldsymbol{y}$). We give a quantum procedure that runs the code $O(n)$ times and returns an estimate $\widehat{\boldsymbolΞΌ}$ for $ΞΌ= \mathrm{E}[\boldsymbol{y}]$ that with high probability satisfies $|\widehat{\boldsymbolΞΌ} - ΞΌ| \leq Οƒ/n$, where $Οƒ= \mathrm{stddev}[\boldsymbol{y}]$. This dependence on $n$ is optimal for quantum algorithms. One may compare with classical algorithms, which can only achieve the quadratically worse $|\widehat{\boldsymbolΞΌ} - ΞΌ| \leq Οƒ/\sqrt{n}$. Our method improves upon previous works, which either made additional assumptions about $\boldsymbol{y}$, and/or assumed the algorithm knew an a priori bound on $Οƒ$, and/or used additional logarithmic factors beyond $O(n)$. The central subroutine for our result is essentially Grover's algorithm but with complex phases.ally Grover's algorithm but with complex phases.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted