Quantum Lower Bounds for Finding Stationary Points of Nonconvex Functions

December 07, 2022 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Machine Learning

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Chenyi Zhang, Tongyang Li arXiv ID 2212.03906 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 10 Venue International Conference on Machine Learning Last Checked 4 months ago
Abstract
Quantum algorithms for optimization problems are of general interest. Despite recent progress in classical lower bounds for nonconvex optimization under different settings and quantum lower bounds for convex optimization, quantum lower bounds for nonconvex optimization are still widely open. In this paper, we conduct a systematic study of quantum query lower bounds on finding $Ξ΅$-approximate stationary points of nonconvex functions, and we consider the following two important settings: 1) having access to $p$-th order derivatives; or 2) having access to stochastic gradients. The classical query lower bounds is $Ξ©\big(Ξ΅^{-\frac{1+p}{p}}\big)$ regarding the first setting, and $Ξ©(Ξ΅^{-4})$ regarding the second setting (or $Ξ©(Ξ΅^{-3})$ if the stochastic gradient function is mean-squared smooth). In this paper, we extend all these classical lower bounds to the quantum setting. They match the classical algorithmic results respectively, demonstrating that there is no quantum speedup for finding $Ξ΅$-stationary points of nonconvex functions with $p$-th order derivative inputs or stochastic gradient inputs, whether with or without the mean-squared smoothness assumption. Technically, our quantum lower bounds are obtained by showing that the sequential nature of classical hard instances in all these settings also applies to quantum queries, preventing any quantum speedup other than revealing information of the stationary points sequentially.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted