Anti-crossings occurrence as exponentially closing gaps in Quantum Annealing

April 25, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› Physical Review A

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Arthur Braida, Simon Martiel, Ioan Todinca arXiv ID 2304.12872 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.DS Citations 0 Venue Physical Review A Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
This paper explores the phenomenon of avoided level crossings in quantum annealing, a promising framework for quantum computing that may provide a quantum advantage for certain tasks. Quantum annealing involves letting a quantum system evolve according to the SchrΓΆdinger equation, with the goal of obtaining the optimal solution to an optimization problem through measurements of the final state. However, the continuous nature of quantum annealing makes analytical analysis challenging, particularly with regard to the instantaneous eigenenergies. The adiabatic theorem provides a theoretical result for the annealing time required to obtain the optimal solution with high probability, which is inversely proportional to the square of the minimum spectral gap. Avoided level crossings can create exponentially closing gaps, which can lead to exponentially long running times for optimization problems. In this paper, we use a perturbative expansion to derive a condition for the occurrence of an avoided level crossing during the annealing process. We then apply this condition to the MaxCut problem on bipartite graphs. We show that no exponentially small gaps arise for regular bipartite graphs, implying that QA can efficiently solve MaxCut in that case. On the other hand, we show that irregularities in the vertex degrees can lead to the satisfaction of the avoided level crossing occurrence condition. We provide numerical evidence to support this theoretical development, and discuss the relation between the presence of exponentially closing gaps and the failure of quantum annealing.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted