Randomized adiabatic quantum linear solver algorithm with optimal complexity scaling and detailed running costs
May 19, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· π PRX Quantum 6, 040373 (2025)
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
David Jennings, Matteo Lostaglio, Sam Pallister, Andrew T Sornborger, YiΔit SubaΕΔ±
arXiv ID
2305.11352
Category
quant-ph: Quantum Computing
Cross-listed
cs.DS
Citations
19
Venue
PRX Quantum 6, 040373 (2025)
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
Solving linear systems of equations is a fundamental problem with a wide variety of applications across many fields of science, and there is increasing effort to develop quantum linear solver algorithms. [SubaΕi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (2019)] proposed a randomized algorithm inspired by adiabatic quantum computing, based on a sequence of random Hamiltonian simulation steps, with suboptimal scaling in the condition number $ΞΊ$ of the linear system and the target error $Ξ΅$. Here we go beyond these results in several ways. Firstly, using filtering~[Lin et al., Quantum (2019)] and Poissonization techniques [Cunningham et al., arXiv:2406.03972 (2024)], the algorithm complexity is improved to the optimal scaling $O(ΞΊ\log(1/Ξ΅))$ -- an exponential improvement in $Ξ΅$, and a shaving of a $\log ΞΊ$ scaling factor in $ΞΊ$. Secondly, the algorithm is further modified to achieve constant factor improvements, which are vital as we progress towards hardware implementations on fault-tolerant devices. We introduce a cheaper randomized walk operator method replacing Hamiltonian simulation -- which also removes the need for potentially challenging classical precomputations; randomized routines are sampled over optimized random variables; circuit constructions are improved. We obtain a closed formula rigorously upper bounding the expected number of times one needs to apply a block-encoding of the linear system matrix to output a quantum state encoding the solution to the linear system. The upper bound is $837 ΞΊ$ at $Ξ΅=10^{-10}$ for Hermitian matrices.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Quantum Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Quantum machine learning: a classical perspective
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Noise-Adaptive Compiler Mappings for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computers
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ProjectQ: An Open Source Software Framework for Quantum Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Quantum Recommendation Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Traffic flow optimization using a quantum annealer
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted