Skipper: Improving the Reach and Fidelity of Quantum Annealers by Skipping Long Chains

December 01, 2023 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ramin Ayanzadeh, Moinuddin Qureshi arXiv ID 2312.00264 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.AI, cs.AR, cs.ET, cs.PF Citations 2 Venue International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
Quantum Annealers (QAs) operate as single-instruction machines, lacking a SWAP operation to overcome limited qubit connectivity. Consequently, multiple physical qubits are chained to form a program qubit with higher connectivity, resulting in a drastically diminished effective QA capacity by up to 33x. We observe that in QAs: (a) chain lengths exhibit a power-law distribution, a few dominant chains holding substantially more qubits than others; and (b) about 25% of physical qubits remain unused, getting isolated between these chains. We propose Skipper, a software technique that enhances the capacity and fidelity of QAs by skipping dominant chains and substituting their program qubit with two readout results. Using a 5761-qubit QA, we demonstrate that Skipper can tackle up to 59% (Avg. 28%) larger problems when eleven chains are skipped. Additionally, Skipper can improve QA fidelity by up to 44% (Avg. 33%) when cutting five chains (32 runs). Users can specify up to eleven chain cuts in Skipper, necessitating about 2,000 distinct quantum executable runs. To mitigate this, we introduce Skipper-G, a greedy scheme that skips sub-problems less likely to hold the global optimum, executing a maximum of 23 quantum executables with eleven chain trims. Skipper-G can boost QA fidelity by up to 41% (Avg. 29%) when cutting five chains (11 runs).
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted