Testing and learning structured quantum Hamiltonians
October 31, 2024 Β· Declared Dead Β· π Communications in Mathematical Physics
"No code URL or promise found in abstract"
Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner
Authors
Srinivasan Arunachalam, Arkopal Dutt, Francisco Escudero GutiΓ©rrez
arXiv ID
2411.00082
Category
quant-ph: Quantum Computing
Cross-listed
cs.CC,
cs.DS
Citations
11
Venue
Communications in Mathematical Physics
Last Checked
5 months ago
Abstract
We consider the problems of testing and learning an unknown $n$-qubit Hamiltonian $H$ from queries to its evolution operator $e^{-iHt}$ under the normalized Frobenius norm. We prove: 1. Local Hamiltonians: We give a tolerant testing protocol to decide if $H$ is $Ξ΅_1$-close to $k$-local or $Ξ΅_2$-far from $k$-local, with $O(1/(Ξ΅_2-Ξ΅_1)^{4})$ queries, solving open questions posed in a recent work by Bluhm et al. For learning a $k$-local $H$ up to error $Ξ΅$, we give a protocol with query complexity $\exp(O(k^2+k\log(1/Ξ΅)))$ independent of $n$, by leveraging the non-commutative Bohnenblust-Hille inequality. 2. Sparse Hamiltonians: We give a protocol to test if $H$ is $Ξ΅_1$-close to being $s$-sparse (in the Pauli basis) or $Ξ΅_2$-far from being $s$-sparse, with $O(s^{6}/(Ξ΅_2^2-Ξ΅_1^2)^{6})$ queries. For learning up to error $Ξ΅$, we show that $O(s^{4}/Ξ΅^{8})$ queries suffice. 3. Learning without memory: The learning results stated above have no dependence on $n$, but require $n$-qubit quantum memory. We give subroutines that allow us to learn without memory; increasing the query complexity by a $(\log n)$-factor in the local case and an $n$-factor in the sparse case. 4. Testing without memory: We give a new subroutine called Pauli hashing, which allows one to tolerantly test $s$-sparse Hamiltonians with $O(s^{14}/(Ξ΅_2^2-Ξ΅_1^2)^{18})$ queries. A key ingredient is showing that $s$-sparse Pauli channels can be tolerantly tested under the diamond norm with $O(s^2/(Ξ΅_2-Ξ΅_1)^6)$ queries. Along the way, we prove new structural theorems for local and sparse Hamiltonians. We complement our learning results with polynomially weaker lower bounds. Furthermore, our algorithms use short time evolutions and do not assume prior knowledge of the terms in the support of the Pauli spectrum.
Community Contributions
Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!
π Similar Papers
In the same crypt β Quantum Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Quantum machine learning: a classical perspective
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Noise-Adaptive Compiler Mappings for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computers
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
ProjectQ: An Open Source Software Framework for Quantum Computing
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Quantum Recommendation Systems
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Traffic flow optimization using a quantum annealer
Died the same way β π» Ghosted
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Detection: CNN Architectures, Dataset Characteristics and Transfer Learning
R.I.P.
π»
Ghosted