Error correction, authentication, and false acceptance, probabilities for communication over noisy quantum channels: converse upper bounds on the bit transmission rate

July 03, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Pete Rigas arXiv ID 2507.03035 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.IT, math.PR Citations 1 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
We obtain strict upper bounds on the bit transmission rate for communication of Classical bit codewords over Quantum channels. Albeit previous arguments in arXiv: 1804.01797 which have demonstrated that lower bounds can be shown to hold for the bit transmission rate without the presence of significant noise over the channel shared by Alice and Bob for the purposes of encoding, decoding, transmission and authentication, the author suggests that upper bounding the bit transmission rate could be of use towards classifying paradoxical aspects of communication protocols, as well as constructing error correcting codes which are resilient to noise. The upper bound that is obtained in this work for the bit transmission rate, as a converse result, is dependent upon the natural logarithm of the size of each player's alphabet, as well as smaller alphabets, which can be leveraged for simultaneously realizing Quantum advantage for maximizing error correction and minimizing false acceptance. Crucially, the upper bound to the bit transmission rate is dependent upon a pruning procedure, which seeks to determine whether letters from player's alphabets can be removed so that prospective Quantum advantage, in order for Alice and Bob to implement error correction protocols with high probability, despite the fact that there is more noise over the channel between Alice and Bob in comparison to that between Bob and Eve.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted