Instance-Optimal Quantum State Certification with Entangled Measurements

July 08, 2025 Β· Declared Dead Β· πŸ› arXiv.org

πŸ‘» CAUSE OF DEATH: Ghosted
No code link whatsoever

"No code URL or promise found in abstract"

Evidence collected by the PWNC Scanner

Authors Ryan O'Donnell, Chirag Wadhwa arXiv ID 2507.06010 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.DS, cs.LG Citations 4 Venue arXiv.org Last Checked 5 months ago
Abstract
We consider the task of quantum state certification: given a description of a hypothesis state $Οƒ$ and multiple copies of an unknown state $ρ$, a tester aims to determine whether the two states are equal or $Ξ΅$-far in trace distance. It is known that $Θ(d/Ξ΅^2)$ copies of $ρ$ are necessary and sufficient for this task, assuming the tester can make entangled measurements over all copies [CHW07,OW15,BOW19]. However, these bounds are for a worst-case $Οƒ$, and it is not known what the optimal copy complexity is for this problem on an instance-by-instance basis. While such instance-optimal bounds have previously been shown for quantum state certification when the tester is limited to measurements unentangled across copies [CLO22,CLHL22], they remained open when testers are unrestricted in the kind of measurements they can perform. We address this open question by proving nearly instance-optimal bounds for quantum state certification when the tester can perform fully entangled measurements. Analogously to the unentangled setting, we show that the optimal copy complexity for certifying $Οƒ$ is given by the worst-case complexity times the fidelity between $Οƒ$ and the maximally mixed state. We prove our lower bounds using a novel quantum analogue of the Ingster-Suslina method, which is likely to be of independent interest. This method also allows us to recover the $Ξ©(d/Ξ΅^2)$ lower bound for mixedness testing [OW15], i.e., certification of the maximally mixed state, with a surprisingly simple proof.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing

Died the same way β€” πŸ‘» Ghosted