Q-SINDy: Quantum-Kernel Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics with Provable Coefficient Debiasing

April 18, 2026 Β· Grace Period Β· + Add venue

⏳ Grace Period
This paper is less than 90 days old. We give authors time to release their code before passing judgment.
Authors Samrendra Roy, Syed Bahauddin Alam arXiv ID 2604.16779 Category quant-ph: Quantum Computing Cross-listed cs.LG Citations 0
Abstract
Quantum feature maps offer expressive embeddings for classical learning tasks, and augmenting sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics (SINDy) with such features is a natural but unexplored direction. We introduce Q-SINDy, a quantum-kernel-augmented SINDy framework, and identify a specific failure mode that arises: coefficient cannibalization, in which quantum features absorb coefficient mass that rightfully belongs to the polynomial basis, corrupting equation recovery. We derive the exact cannibalization-bias formula Delta xi_P = (P^T P)^{-1} P^T Q xi_Q and prove that orthogonalizing quantum features against the polynomial column space at fit time eliminates this bias exactly. The claim is verified numerically to machine precision (<10^-12) on multiple systems. Empirically, across six canonical dynamical systems (Duffing, Van der Pol, Lorenz, Lotka-Volterra, cubic oscillator, Rossler) and three quantum feature map architectures (ZZ-angle encoding, IQP, data re-uploading), orthogonalized Q-SINDy consistently matches vanilla SINDy's structural recovery while uncorrected augmentation degrades true-positive rates by up to 100%. A refined dynamics-aware diagnostic, R^2_Q for X-dot, predicts cannibalization severity with statistical significance (Pearson r=0.70, p=0.023). An RBF classical-kernel control across 20 hyperparameter configurations fails more severely than any quantum variant, ruling out feature count as the cause. Orthogonalization remains robust under depolarizing hardware noise up to 2% per gate, and the framework extends without modification to Burgers' equation.
Community shame:
Not yet rated
Community Contributions

Found the code? Know the venue? Think something is wrong? Let us know!

πŸ“œ Similar Papers

In the same crypt β€” Quantum Computing